Trust Mechanisms Overview
Intuition creates a decentralized trust layer through its primitives and economic incentives. This guide explains how trust emerges and is validated in the system.
Many-to-One Attestationsβ
Unlike traditional systems where a single authority issues certificates or attestations, Intuition enables many-to-one non-deterministic attestations:
Key Characteristicsβ
- Multiple Validators: Any number of users can signal their belief
- Weighted Consensus: Aggregate signal determines confidence level
- No Single Point of Failure: Truth emerges from collective validation
- Dynamic Evolution: Attestations change as new information emerges
Trust Generation Mechanismsβ
Explicit Trustβ
Direct attestations through staking:
- Users lock tokens to express belief
- Economic skin in the game
- Clear, verifiable positions
- Trackable over time
Implicit Trustβ
Derived from usage patterns:
- Frequency of references
- Inclusion in applications
- Query patterns
- Network effects
Transitive Trustβ
Trust propagates through relationships:
- Trusted sources carry more weight
- Web-of-trust effects
- Personalized trust graphs
- Reality Tunnels leverage this
Attestation Typesβ
Identity Attestationsβ
Verifying entities are who they claim:
[Address X] - [is controlled by] - [Person Y]
[Account] - [verified by] - [KYC Provider]
Fact Attestationsβ
Asserting truth of statements:
[Company X] - [acquired] - [Company Y]
[Event Z] - [occurred on] - [Date]
Credential Attestationsβ
Verifying qualifications:
[Person] - [has degree from] - [University]
[Developer] - [contributed to] - [Project]
Trust Evaluationβ
Factors Consideredβ
- Stake Amount: Economic backing of claim
- Attestor Quality: Reputation and history
- Attestor Diversity: Number of independent validators
- Time Factor: How long has consensus held
- Counter-Signal: Strength of opposing views
Consensus Calculationβ
// Example simplified consensus
const totalFor = sumStakes(positiveAttestors)
const totalAgainst = sumStakes(negativeAttestors)
const consensus = totalFor / (totalFor + totalAgainst)
// Weighted by attestor reputation
const weightedConsensus = sumWeightedStakes(attestors, reputations)
Trust Discoveryβ
Finding Trusted Dataβ
Users can filter information by trust criteria:
// Minimum trust thresholds
const trustedClaims = query({
minStake: 10000,
minConsensus: 0.8,
minAttestors: 10
})
// Specific attestor requirements
const verified = query({
requireSignalFrom: ["Official Source", "Domain Expert"]
})
Reality Tunnelsβ
Create personalized trust lenses:
- Define whose signals matter to you
- Weight different attestor types
- Filter based on trust criteria
- Multiple valid worldviews
Verification Mechanismsβ
On-Chain Verificationβ
- All stakes are transparent
- View who attested to what
- See stake amounts and timing
- Verify bonding curve positions
Off-Chain Verificationβ
- IPFS-stored data integrity
- DID document validation
- External source linking
- Cross-reference checking
Trust Building Over Timeβ
Reputation Accumulationβ
- Consistent accurate signals build reputation
- Early correct attestations rewarded
- Historical track record visible
- Stake-weighted influence
Network Effectsβ
- More participants increase reliability
- Diverse attestors strengthen consensus
- Cross-validation improves accuracy
- System self-improves
Trust Anti-Patternsβ
Centralization Risksβ
- Whale dominance
- Cartel formation
- Sybil attempts
- Mitigated through diverse signals
Quality Issuesβ
- Popularity β accuracy
- Echo chambers
- Misinformation campaigns
- Addressed through counter-signals
Next Stepsβ
- Signal Fundamentals - How trust is expressed
- Architecture Overview - System design for trust
- Economics - Economic trust incentives